Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Michael Dionne v. Barbara Sampson, et al
as 11-1477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DIONNE
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA S. SAMPSON, JAMES ATTERBERRY, MIGUAL BERRIOS and others
Hunter #229916 v. Michigan Parole Board, et al
as 2:2011cv00122
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board and Ted Hammon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter #229916 v. Alger Maximum Correctional Facility, et al
as 2:2011cv00100
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Alger Maximum Correctional Facility, Catherine Bauman, Unknown Rutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter #229916 v. Hammon, et al
as 2:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Ted Hammon, Michigan Department of Corrections Parole and Pardon Commutation Board, People of the State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers #095405 v. Granholm et al
as 1:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Floyd Chambers #095405
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Granholm, James Atterberry, Barbara Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Granholm et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2010cv14761
Plaintiff:
Floyd Chambers
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Granholm, James Atterberry, Barbara Sampson and others
Hippler #259981 v. Caruso et al
as 1:2010cv00776
Plaintiff:
Paul Allan Hippler #259981
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Barbara S. Sampson, David Kleinhardt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Deming v. Ted Hammon, et al
as 10-1940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT J. DEMING
Defendant - Appellee:
TED HAMMON, Michigan Parole Board Member and MIGUAL BERRIOS, Michigan Parole Board Member
Deming #194704 v. Hammon et al
as 1:2010cv00529
Plaintiff:
Scott J. Deming #194704
Defendant:
Ted Hammon and Migual Berrios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deming v. Hammon et al
as 2:2010cv12098
Plaintiff:
Scott Deming
Defendant:
Ted Hammon and Migual Berrios
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
