Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02452
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02451
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BARTH v. UNITED STATES DEPT. OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2022cv00955
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. BARTH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPT. OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUR. OF INVESTIGATION, HOMELAND SEC. INVESTIGATIONS. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HEAD v. SAMPLE et al
as 1:2021cv02550
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HEAD
Defendant:
SAMPLE, J. R. BELL, S. EIRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRASAD et al v. CAPTAIN B et al
as 1:2020cv02191
Defendant:
CAPTAIN B, SGT T. JONES, OFC COX and others
Plaintiff:
SUNDARI K. PRASAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION v. US DEPT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY
as 1:2020cv00752
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
US DEPT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
OKEAYAINNEH v. U S DEPT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2020cv00244
Defendant:
DIRECTOR/CHIEF OF HUMAN RESOURCES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U S DEPT OF JUSTICE and U S ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff:
JULIAN OKEAYAINNEH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WELSH v. U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2019cv02121
Defendant:
U S ATTORNEY GENERAL, U S DEPT OF JUSTICE, KEVIN KREBS and others
Plaintiff:
HOWARD WELSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JENNINGS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2011cv00831
Plaintiff:
TROY JENNINGS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, BROOKLYN U.S. PROBATION DEPT., U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
