Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Sorrell et al v. Kellogg Company
as 1:2016mc00037
Movant:
William H. Sorrell , Peter E. Shumlin , Harry L. Chen and others
Respondent:
Kellogg Company
Perez v. Kellogg Company et al
as 1:2013cv00764
Plaintiff:
Gloria Perez
Defendant:
Kellogg Company and Keebler Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicappers
United States of America v. Kellogg USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01164
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kellogg USA, Inc. , Keebler Company and Kellogg Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413 (b) Clean Air Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Arnold v. Kellogg Company
as 1:2009cv01157
Plaintiff:
Sonya Arnold
Defendant:
Kellogg Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Berger et al v. Kellogg Company et al
as 2:2009cv13205
Plaintiff:
Robin Denise Berger and Michael Berger
Defendant:
Kellogg Company and Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Type:
Other Statutes
Berger et al v. Kellogg Company et al
as 2:2009cv13193
Plaintiff:
Robin Denise Berger and Michael Berger
Defendant:
Kellogg Company and Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
