Cases 11 - 20 of 352
Latham v. Demissie, et al
as 23-1904
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINCOLN LATHAM, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DEREGE B. DEMISSIE, Lawyer Register at Board of Bar Overseer, BEANIE SIGEL, Singer at Rocafella Records in New York, LUTHER WALLIS, Correctional Officer & Prison Guard and others
In Re: Talasazan
as 23-1780
Petitioner:
HAREL TALASAZAN
Respondent:
ROBERT M. FARRELL, MARIA RAIA HAMILTON, MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS and others
In Re: Hughes
as 23-8029
Respondent:
PAUL S. HUGHES
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
Latham v. Demissie, et al
as 23-1534
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINCOLN LATHAM, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DEREGE B. DEMISSIE, Lawyer Register at Board of Bar Overseer, BEANIE SIGEL, Singer at Rocafella Records in New York, LUTHER WALLIS, Correctional Officer & Prison Guard and others
Laroche-St. Fleur
as 23-8024
Respondent:
MAUDE LAROCHE-ST. FLEUR
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
IN RE: SCOTT L. FENSTERMAKER, ESQ.
as 2:2023cv00174
Respondent:
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR
Petitioner:
SCOTT L FENSTERMAKER, ESQ
Art Ask Agency v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2023cv02212
Plaintiff:
Art Ask Agency
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, BKQU Oversize Store, Dinboa-6 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 Trademark Infringement
In Re: Traft
as 23-8020
Respondent:
MICHAEL JOSEPH TRAFT
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
In Re: Hayes
as 23-8019
Respondent:
JAMES HAYES
Interested Party:
MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS and MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
IN RE: JON P PLOURDE, ESQ
as 2:2023cv00144
Petitioner:
JON P PLOURDE, ESQ
Respondent:
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
