Cases 11 - 20 of 63
SNOW v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00182
Petitioner:
THOMAS J. SNOW
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL, ROBERT E. CARTER, POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PERRY v. POPE et al
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
JASON S. PERRY
Defendant:
C. POPE, C. HOLCOMB, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POPE v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
HAROLD POPE
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
POPE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00350
Petitioner:
JASAUN POPE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CONTEH et al v. THE INDEPENDENT ORDER OF FORESTERS
as 1:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
SWARAY CONTEH and BETH POPE
Defendant:
THE INDEPENDENT ORDER OF FORESTERS and THE INDEPENDENT ORDER OF FORESTERS, dba FORESTERS FINANCIAL and FORESTERS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
POPE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02393
Plaintiff:
HAROLD I. POPE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
SNOW v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SNOW
Defendant:
MATTHEW BROWN, DANIEL BEDWELL, KEVIN GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNOW v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. SNOW
Defendant:
MATTHEW BROWN, KEVIN GILMORE, RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ARNOLD v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2021cv00459
Plaintiff:
KEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
WARDEN, POPE, BENIFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
