Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Soda v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management et al
as 1:2015cv00898
Plaintiff:
Frank Soda
Defendant:
U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Phyllis Matthews Burwell, Jacob K. Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Perez v. Williams et al
as 8:2015cv00056
Defendant:
Nathan Williams, NW Systems, Inc and NW Systems Inc. 401(k) Profit-Sharing Plan and Trust
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Williams v. Perez et al
as 8:2015cv00017
Petitioner:
Nichole Williams
Respondent:
Thomas E. Perez, Gary A. Steinberg and Angela Winn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151
Stine v. Covahey, Boozer, Devan & Dore et al
as 1:2014cv03785
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Stine
Defendant:
Covahey, Boozer, Devan & Dore, John Sica, P.A., M & T Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. The CFP Group, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv01836
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Perez
Respondent:
The CFP Group, Inc., The CFP Group Health Plan, The CFP Group 401(k) Savings Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Administrative Subpoena
Perez v. Hathaway et al
as 1:2013cv03253
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
William Kirsten Hathaway and Baltimore Behavioral Health 403(b) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Cusick v. Perez et al
as 8:2013cv02852
Plaintiff:
James P. Cusick, Jr.
Defendant:
Thomas E. Perez and Bruce Dory
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Bradley v. Perez et al
as 1:2009cv00786
Plaintiff:
Theresa Bradley
Defendant:
Thomas E. Perez and NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. State Of Maryland et al
as 1:2008cv00759
Plaintiff:
Theresa Bradley
Defendant:
State Of Maryland, Dept. of Labor, State of Maryland, Martin O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
