Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Brooks v. Colo. Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 16-1469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAVID OBA, PATRICK BLAKE and others
Sharon v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv02748
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Kelly Wasko and others
Plaintiff:
Todd B. Sharon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Choquette v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2016cv01845
Plaintiff:
Dennis Choquette
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Jordan Melgoza , Jayne Scarff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Creany, et al
as 16-1105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE EDWARD PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY CREANY, BEDDY, DAVID TESSIER and others
Sherman v. Klenke, et al
as 15-1378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW RYAN SHERMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM KLENKE, DOLORES MONTOYA, TIMOTHY CREANY and others
Sherman v. Klenke, et al
as 15-1378
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM KLENKE, TIMOTHY CREANY, CORRECTIONAL HEALTH PARTNERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW RYAN SHERMAN
Chandan Vora v. Don Michaels, et al
as 14-4571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHANDAN S. VORA
Defendant - Appellee:
DON MICHAELS, J. WHITE, CRAIG FOUST and others
Debtor - Appellee:
E. SMITH
Templeton, et al v. Anderson, et al
as 14-1334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES TEMPLETON and DAVID COWDEN
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GALLOB and DAVID ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER ANDERSON, JEFF SMITH, JAMES CHANEY and others
Peterson v. Archuletta et al
as 1:2014cv01916
Plaintiff:
Bruce Edward Peterson
Defendant:
Lou Archuletta, Timothy Creany, Beddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Creany, et al
as 1:2013cv01792
Plaintiff:
Danny Cook
Defendant:
Timothy Creany, Kayla Wilson, Michael Pasewark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
