Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Sienda v. Trader Joe's East Inc.
as 1:2018cv00110
Plaintiff:
Jolly Sienda
Defendant:
Trader Joe's East Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moss v. Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company et al
as 3:2017cv00312
Plaintiff:
Constance Moss
Defendant:
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company , ALG Trustee, LLC and Orlans, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Milby v. Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company et al
as 3:2015cv00322
Plaintiff:
Zebedee Milby
Defendant:
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company and Roslyn Elder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haley et al v. Camping World RV Sales, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00319
Plaintiff:
James E. Haley and Mary Haley
Defendant:
Camping World RV Sales, LLC, Keystone RV Company and Manufacturers and Traders Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Wegner v. United States of America, et al.
as 3:2014cv00851
Plaintiff:
Debra L. Wegner
Defendant:
United States of America, Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company , Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Kelly v. Trader Joe's East Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00111
Plaintiff:
Dawn C. Kelly
Defendant:
Trader Joe's East Inc. , Trader Joe's Corporation, Trader Joe's Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company v. RBU Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv01108
Plaintiff:
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company
Defendant:
RBU Enterprises, LLC and James M. Rose, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
TPI Holdings, Inc. et al v. traders-online.net
as 1:2007cv00198
Plaintiff:
TPI Holdings, Inc. and Dominion Enterprises
Defendant:
traders-online.net
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
