Cases filed in Utah
Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Inception Mining et al v. Danzig et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00944
Plaintiff: Inception Mining , Michael Ahlin and Trent D'Ambrosio
Defendant: Danzig , Elliott Foxcroft and Brett Bertolami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Iravani v. Woolston et al
as 2:2017cv00132
Plaintiff: Farhad Iravani
Defendant: Trent S. Woolston and Rocky Mountain Transportation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Needham v. State of Utah We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00115
Petitioner: Aaron David Trent Needham
Defendant: State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Trent et al v. West Valley City et al
as 2:2016cv01171
Plaintiff: Erick Trent and Jodi Trent
Defendant: West Valley City and J. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00970
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Needham v. State of Utah We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00146
Petitioner: Aaron David Trent Needham
Respondent: State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parkinson v. Gill et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00796
Plaintiff: Michael Roy Parkinson
Defendant: Sim Gill, Chad L. Platt, George Vo-duc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Needham v. State of Utah et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00250
Plaintiff: Aaron David Trent Needham
Defendant: State of Utah, Mark L. Shurtleff, John Swallow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron v. State of Utah
as 2:2015cv00146
Petitioner: Aaron David Trent Needham
Respondent: State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00626
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Receiver: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?