Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Smith v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2011cv00113
Plaintiff:
Richard G Smith
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of , Chuck Jordan , Daryl Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Tulsa City-County Library System
as 4:2011cv00031
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Harris
Defendant:
Tulsa City-County Library System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
London v. Hill et al
as 4:2011cv00028
Plaintiff:
Patrick Neil London
Defendant:
Eric J Hill, David A Foust, Joseph W Beaty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2010cv00815
Plaintiff:
Keith Dale Martin
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of, Jessie Harris and Michelle Keeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2010cv00507
Plaintiff:
Larita Barnes
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of, Brandon Jay McFadden and Jeff Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haley et al v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2010cv00361
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wayne Haley, Sr , Anthony Haley , Ashlee Haley and others
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of and Tulsa Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Millikin v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2010cv00314
Plaintiff:
Wesley Millikin
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of and Donald B Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson, et al v. Tulsa, City of
as 4:1994cv00039
Plaintiff:
Roy C Johnson , Mark A Moore , Dwight E Jackson and others
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of
Intervenor_defendant:
Lodge 93 Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge #93
Pecial_master:
John A Gaberino, Jr
Claimant:
Matthew Wick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bennett v. Johnson et al
as 4:2009cv00612
Plaintiff:
Edward Bennett
Defendant:
Lashedda Johnson, Mark Wollmershauser, Tulsa, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
