Cases 11 - 20 of 59
National Infusion Center Association et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 1:2023cv00707
Plaintiff:
National Infusion Center Association, Global Colon Cancer Association and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
State of Texas et al v. Brooks-LaSure et al
as 6:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
State of Texas and Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Defendant:
Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
FILING ERROR
as 1:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra and United States Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
The State of Texas v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 7:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas and Mayo Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra and United States Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC, Dr. Adam Corley and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Personnel Management, Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Society of Anesthesiologists, American College of Radiology, American College of Emergency Physicians and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc. and East Texas Air One
Consolidated Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians Advocacy Institute, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Tice-Harouff v. Johnson et al
as 6:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Cami Jo Tice-Harouff
Defendant:
Carole Johnson, Health Resources and Services Administration of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Van Duyne et al v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al
as 4:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Van Duyne and The State of Texas
Defendant:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Rochelle P. Walensky, Sherri A Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas et al v. Becerra, et al
as 5:2021cv00300
Plaintiff:
State of Texas and Lubbock Independent School District
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA,, United States Department of Health and Human Services, JOOYUEN CHANG and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas v. Optum Services Inc et al
as 3:2021cv02838
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas
Defendant:
Optum Services Inc, Michael Dodds, Law Office of B Ward Maedgen PC and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
The People and Culture Committee, Texas Health, The Governance Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
