Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Gunter v. US Marshal Service et al
as 4:2021cv04090
Plaintiff:
Buddy Hal Gunter
Defendant:
Tracy Burgard, Jane Doe, Lou Glossip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carnell v. Sherriff et al
as 3:2021cv00463
Plaintiff:
Scott Carnell
Defendant:
Sherriff and US Marshall Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gunter v. US Marshal Service et al
as 4:2021cv04086
Plaintiff:
Buddy Hal Gunter
Defendant:
Tracy Burgard, Advance Correctional Health Care Inc, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. North Chicago Police et al
as 1:2020cv02819
Defendant:
Bryan Antonelli, Magistrate Mason, Bop and others
Plaintiff:
Shariff Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hackney v. US Marshals Service et al
as 3:2020cv00015
Defendant:
C/O Middendorf, Jarod Peters, US Marshals Service and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Q. Hackney, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shekar v. Castillo et al
as 1:2019cv04555
Defendant:
Clerk, 7th Circuit Gino Agnello, United States of America, Circuit Executive Collins T Fitzpatrick and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Shekar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
In Re the Seizure of: One 2018 Forester RV, $521,550.00 in US Currency, and miscellaneous property
as 3:2018mc00039
Movant:
Patrick N. Barber
Respondent:
USA , Department of Justice , Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Miller v. Cobb
as 3:2018cv00624
Plaintiff:
Randall A Miller
Defendant:
Randy Cobb, US Marshals Service and Doug Maier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Besser v. US Marshals Service
as 1:2016cv01239
Plaintiff:
George Terrance Besser
Defendant:
US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. US Marshal Service et al
as 2:2014cv02211
Plaintiff:
Joseph Miller
Defendant:
US Marshal Service, Tim Bukowski, Michael Downey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
