Cases 11 - 20 of 5,132
Jason Kunkel v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv04771
Defendant:
Corteva Inc, Chubb Fire LTD, Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Kunkel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jackson v. USA
as 6:2024cv04789
Petitioner:
Antonio Marques Dominique Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mark Carver et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04634
Plaintiff:
Margaret Carver and Mark Carver
Defendant:
DowDuPont Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Chemguard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Michael Beamish v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04604
Plaintiff:
Michael Beamish
Defendant:
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, The Chemours Company FC, LLC, Nation Ford Chemical Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Norman v. USA
as 7:2024cv04600
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ishmael Ezekiel Fiteem Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Brown v. USA
as 4:2024cv04553
Petitioner:
Tyrone Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Engineered Inserts & Systems Inc v. baier & michels GmbH & Co KG et al
as 6:2024cv04453
Plaintiff:
Engineered Inserts & Systems Inc
Defendant:
baier & michels USA Inc and baier & michels GmbH & Co KG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dukes v. USA
as 4:2024cv04363
Petitioner:
Ventrell Dukes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hall v. USA
as 0:2024cv04375
Petitioner:
Marquis Javaughn Hall, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
