Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Vilela v. Office of Recovery Services et al
as 2:2022cv00699
Plaintiff:
Pedro Vilela
Defendant:
Office of Recovery Services, State of Utah Child Support Enforcement, Liesa Stockdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carbon County et al v. McKinsey and Company
as 2:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Carbon County and Utah County
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Castro et al v. Utah County Sheriff's Department
as 2:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Pedro Castro and Amalia Castro
Defendant:
Utah County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Roy v. Howell et al
as 2:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Roy
Defendant:
Doug Howell, Shaun Lott, Zac Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Large v. Smith et al
as 2:2021cv00452
Plaintiff:
Jeramie John Large
Defendant:
Mike Smith, Rafeal Uvalle, Christian Halverson and others
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rios v. Turf Holdings et al
as 2:2021cv00039
Defendant:
WM Utah County and Turf Holdings doing business as Weed Man USA
Plaintiff:
Chelsie Rios
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Prado v. Hindes et al
as 2:2019cv00003
Defendant:
Shawn Troumbley, Jason Hindes and Utah County
Plaintiff:
Luis Carlos Prado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Utah County v. Purdue Pharma Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00784
Defendant:
Purdue Federick Company, The, Purdue Pharma LP, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Utah County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
