Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Woodard v. Davis
as 4:2018cv01999
Petitioner:
Matthew Vincent Woodard
Respondent:
Lorie W Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Batiste v. Davis
as 4:2018cv01978
Petitioner:
Terrance Trent Batiste
Respondent:
Lorie W Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. Davis
as 4:2018cv01914
Petitioner:
Vernon King, Jr.
Respondent:
Lorie W Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alexander v. Davis
as 4:2017cv01224
Petitioner:
Shedrick Laron Alexander
Respondent:
Lorie W Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Strong et al
as 4:2016cv03746
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hall
Defendant:
Kelly L Strong, Brian S Smith, Matthew R McClarin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Central Grievance Office-TDCJ et al
as 4:2016cv03252
Plaintiff:
Moses Jenkins
Defendant:
Central Grievance Office-TDCJ, Governor of Texas (Board of Criminal Justice), Executive Director CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis, IV v. USW Local 13-423
as 1:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
George W. Davis, IV
Defendant:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, Local Number 13-423
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Davis et al v. Strategic Enviromental & Energy Resources, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00135
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Jerry W Davis and Waylon D Davis
Plaintiff:
Joyce L. Davis and Robert Davis
Defendant:
Strategic Enviromental & Energy Resources, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
Strategic Enviromental & Energy Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garner v. Moore et al
as 2:2013cv00383
Plaintiff:
Willi Free I Garner
Defendant:
Candace Moore, Lorie W Davis, Carol E Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
