Cases 11 - 19 of 19
FORTUNE v. CFCF PRISON et al
as 2:2010cv07568
Plaintiff:
RASHID FORTUNE
Defendant:
CFCF PRISON, WARDEN DELANEY and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAIXMEL v. MAYOR: MICHAEL NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv04765
Plaintiff:
KENNETH FAIXMEL
Defendant:
MAYOR: MICHAEL NUTTER, COMMISIONER: LOUIS GIORLA, WARDEN: DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIRSCHBUHL v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2010cv04532
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CURTIS HIRSCHBUHL
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, PHILADELPHIA HEALTH SYSTEM, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODARD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv04122
Plaintiff:
CRAIG WOODARD
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON SYSTEM, CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NGUYEN v. WARDEN/DELANEY et al
as 2:2010cv03962
Plaintiff:
LOEI NGUYEN
Defendant:
WARDEN/DELANEY, PHILADELPHIA PRISON, CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VITALE v. WARDEN/DELANEY et al
as 2:2010cv03531
Plaintiff:
PASQUALE VITALE
Defendant:
WARDEN/DELANEY, CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTION FACILITY and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILLIS v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2010cv03499
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GILLIS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, MICHAEL NUTTER, CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTION FACITY WARDEN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv01182
Plaintiff:
FRED D. THOMPSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, D.O.C. PHILA., CITY MANAGING DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNETTE v. CURRENT FROMHOLD-CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (WARDEN DELANEY)
as 2:2010cv00571
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER BURNETTE
Defendant:
CURRENT FROMHOLD-CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (WARDEN DELANEY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
