Cases 1 - 10 of 19
TAYLOR v. WARDEN DELANEY OF (CFCF) et al
as 2:2020cv01244
Petitioner:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Respondent:
WARDEN DELANEY OF (CFCF) and ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SAVAGE v. WOELPPER et al
as 2:2019cv01078
Respondent:
JUDGE SCOTT DICLAUDIO, ROONEY, JAREK KRAJEWSKI and others
Petitioner:
RASHAN-I SAVAGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
THOMAS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv00090
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, WARDEN DELANEY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COLE and others
Plaintiff:
EVERETT KEITH THOMAS and KEITH THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAZ v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv02354
Plaintiff:
JUAN A. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, WARDEN DELANEY and GIROLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROGERS v. C.F.C.F. et al
as 2:2011cv03491
Plaintiff:
RONGENO ROGERS
Defendant:
CFCF WARDEN DELANEY, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv03497
Plaintiff:
KEMICO ANTONIO WASHINGTON
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, WARDEN DELANEY and LOUIS GIORIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYWARD v. C.F.C.F. WARDEN DELANEY et al
as 2:2011cv03417
Plaintiff:
JAMES HAYWARD
Defendant:
C.F.C.F. WARDEN DELANEY and PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALMERO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv01333
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL PALMERO
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and WARDEN DELANEY (OF CFCF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv00669
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and WARDEN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLIVE v. MAYOR: MICHAEL NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv00172
Plaintiff:
KENNETH KLIVE
Defendant:
MAYOR: MICHAEL NUTTER, COMMISIONER: LOUIS GIORLA, WARDEN: DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
