Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Rodney Simmons v. Warden Larry Cartledge
as 16-6518
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODNEY SIMMONS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE
Anthony L. Mattison v. Warden Larry Cartledge
as 16-6450
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. MATTISON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE
Respondent:
ALAN WILSON
Adarius Dennis v. Warden Cartledge
as 16-6430
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADARIUS QUANTE DENNIS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE
Michael Minor v. Larry Cartledge
as 16-6100
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. MINOR
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE
Ervin Lopez v. Larry Cartledge
as 15-7653
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERVIN M. LOPEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE
William Dawson, Jr. v. Larry Cartledge
as 15-7420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS DAWSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE, in his individual capacity and ASSOCIATE WARDEN FLORENCE MAUNEY, in her individual capacity
Calvin Gaddy v. Captain DeGeorgi
as 15-6660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN LYNDALE GADDY, a/k/a Calvin L. Gaddy
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN DEGEORGIS
Defendant:
NIKKI R. HALEY, South Carolina Governor, BILL BYERS, SCDC Commissioner, WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE, Perry CI and others
Robert Herbert v. Larry Cartledge
as 15-6461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT FLETCHER HERBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE, of Perry Correctional Institution SCDC
William Dawson, Jr. v. Denis Bush
as 15-6325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS DAWSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ASS. WARDEN DENIS BUSH, Individually and in their official capacity, WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE, Individually and in their official capacity and ASS. WARDEN FLORENCE MAUNEY, Individually and in their official capacity
Dewayne McKenzie v. Larry Cartledge
as 14-7466
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEWAYNE MCKENZIE, a/k/a Shawn McKenzie
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE
Respondent:
DIRECTOR BILL BYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
