Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Warren F. Arsad, Jr. v. Robert F. Kelly, Sr., et al
as 09-3600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR., a/k/a STRAWMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT F KELLY and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Warren Arsad, Jr. v. Jean A. Sliko, et al
as 09-3378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JEAN A. SLIKO and JULIA WILLINSKI
Warren F. Arsad, Jr. v. Sandra Gerula, et al
as 09-3379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
REBECCA REIFER, Grievance Coordinator, KENNETH CAMERON, Superintendent and SANDRA GERULA, Records Supervisor
Warren F. Arsad, Jr. v. The City of Phila Defenders, et al
as 09-3369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DEFENDER ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN KONCHAK, ESQ. and DENNIS T. KELLY
Warren F. Arsad, Jr. v. The Phila Probation Ofc, et al
as 09-3368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILA PROBATION OFC, JOSEPH MCKILLIP and LOUIS MCFEELEY
ARSAD v. KELLY et al
as 2:2009cv03716
Plaintiff:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT F. KELLY, SR. and DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren F. Arsad, Jr. v. Janine Vinci
as 09-3303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JANINE VINCI
Warren F. Arsad, Jr. v. David Rudenstein
as 09-3304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID S. RUDENSTEIN
Warren F. Arsad, Jr. v. Judicial Conduct Bd of PA, et al
as 09-3305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PA JUDICIAL CONDUCT BD and JOSEPH A. MASSA, JR.
ARSAD v. THE SUPREME COURT et al
as 2:2009cv03642
Plaintiff:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant:
THE SUPREME COURT, DISCIPLINARY BOARD and DONNA SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
