Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00049
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Lloyd v. Whitlock et al
as 1:2015cv00551
Defendant:
3-D Auto Sales and Brian Whitlock
Plaintiff:
Jay Lavone Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pantech Design, LLC v. Audio Fidelity Communications Corporation d/b/a The Whitlock Group
as 4:2015cv00131
Defendant:
Audio Fidelity Communications Corporation d/b/a The Whitlock Group
Plaintiff:
Pantech Design, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Whitlock v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv00546
Petitioner:
Tarrance Daron Whitlock
Respondent:
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitlock v. Dir TDCJ
as 5:2015cv00015
Petitioner:
Tarrance Daron Whitlock
Respondent:
Dir TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitlock v. Merchant et al
as 5:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
Tarrance Daron Whitlock
Defendant:
Dawn Merchant, Tori Scott, Reginaldo Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Grayson County et al
as 4:2014cv00551
Plaintiff:
Robert Payne Watson
Defendant:
Grayson County, Jeff Whitmire, David Whitlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Grayson County et al
as 3:2014cv02761
Plaintiff:
Robert Payne Watson
Defendant:
Grayson County, Jeff Whitmire, David Whitlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitlock v. Stephens et al
as 5:2014cv00094
Plaintiff:
Tarrance Daron Whitlock
Defendant:
William Stephens, Vicki Barrows, Dawn Merchant Grounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitlock v. That Toe Company LLC et al
as 3:2014cv02298
Plaintiff:
Philip Whitlock
Defendant:
That Toe Company LLC and Muhammed Ali
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
