Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv23530
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeff Dillon et al v. Wingstop Restaurants Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv02123
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Inclusive, WINGSTOP RESTAURANTS INC and Wingstop Restaurants Inc.
Plaintiff:
NOLAN HOFFMAN and Jeff Dillon
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Dillon et al v. WINGSTOP RESTAURANTS INC et al
as 8:2017cv02122
Plaintiff:
Jeff Dillon
Defendant:
Does 1 - 10, Inclusive, NOLAN HOFFMAN and WINGSTOP RESTAURANTS INC
Wingstop Restaurants Inc v. Hangar I LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01452
Plaintiff:
Wingstop Restaurants Inc
Defendant:
Hangar I LLC, Hangar 3 LLC and Voshon Lenard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pineda et al v. NY Wing Kings, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01256
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Dominguez, Jacob Garcia, Fidelino Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Chayanne Halani, NY Wing Kings, Inc., Paul Proano and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Wingstop Restaurants, Inc. v. Soltan
as 2:2015cv13378
Plaintiff:
Wingstop Restaurants, Inc.
Defendant:
Mohamed M Soltan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Wingstop Restaurants, Inc. v. TWS of Florida, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv00889
Plaintiff:
Wingstop Restaurants, Inc.
Defendant:
TWS of Florida, Inc., Rashun Preston and Omar Preston
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Wingstop Restaurants, Inc. v. Netzer et al
as 1:2015cv21379
Plaintiff:
Wingstop Restaurants, Inc.
Defendant:
Eran Netzer and Ocean Zone Restaurants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
