Cases 11 - 20 of 772
Eleidy v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02146
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Petitioner:
Jamal Mohammad Eleidy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02147
Respondent:
Warden L. Kelly
Petitioner:
Tory Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Peters v. Hernandez et al
as 5:2024ct03195
Defendant:
Burgaw Police Department, Lt. Rogers, Sgt. Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Dean Rene Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. Locklear
as 5:2024hc02142
Petitioner:
Egbert Francis, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spillane v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02137
Respondent:
Warden Heckard
Petitioner:
Charles Spillane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mooney v. Harrison et al
as 5:2024ct03178
Defendant:
Warden Parker, Officer Chapelle, Officer Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Rufus M. Mooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024hc02134
Petitioner:
David Anthony Harris
Respondent:
Warden Michael T. Persons and Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ghertler v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02128
Petitioner:
Jonathan David Ghertler
Respondent:
Warden K. Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stroupe v. Bullard et al
as 5:2024ct03170
Defendant:
Rosemary Biancardi, Warden Bullard and Seargent Bullard
Plaintiff:
Phillip M. Stroupe, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvey v. Warden of Scotland Correctional et al
as 5:2024ct03162
Plaintiff:
Antwain Devon Harvey
Defendant:
Warden of Tabor Correctional, John Doe Lieutenant and Warden of Scotland Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
