Cases 11 - 20 of 217
Maldonado Castillo v. Prater et al
as 5:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Maldonado Castillo
Defendant:
David Prater, Stephanie Powers, Merydith Easter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Lemaster
as 5:2023cv00517
Petitioner:
Hrondy Tarvus Rogers
Respondent:
Warden David Lemaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jordan v. Brown
as 4:2023cv00233
Petitioner:
Orlando Jordan
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ross v. Cole
as 5:2023cv00489
Petitioner:
Bryan Ross
Respondent:
Warden D. C. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cao v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00486
Petitioner:
Phuong Hoai Cao
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Langley v. Goldey
as 5:2023cv00461
Petitioner:
Jeremy Langley
Respondent:
Warden Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dudley v. Hiniger et al
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Dudley and Dewayne Lewis Dudley
Defendant:
Damon T Hininger, United States Marshals Service, Terrencce Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
David Erwin Jones, Jr
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc doing business as GEO Corrections, Warden Cole and Cheri Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Danmola v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00234
Petitioner:
Yusufu Danmola
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Matthews v. Warden, FCI
as 5:2023cv00020
Petitioner:
Armand Matthews
Respondent:
Warden, FCI El Reno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
