Cases 11 - 20 of 1,358
Damron v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Christopher R. Damron
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
As-Salafi v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Abdul-Malik As-Salafi
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JAMES v. WARDEN
as 5:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Calvin James
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Lovett et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
William C. Brown
Defendant:
Warden Lovett and Dr. Gregory Mimms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Love v. Flowers et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Love
Defendant:
Brandon S. Flowers A.U.S.A., F.C.I Hazelton Warden Rey, F.C.I. Hazelton S.I.S. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Conner v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
John Henry Conner, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden, Merick Garland and Colet Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Martinez-Turcio v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00193
Petitioner:
Javier Alex Martinez-Turcio
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Forbes v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00194
Petitioner:
Dennis A. Forbes
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Smith
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
