Cases 11 - 20 of 350
Luginbyhl v. Moore et al
as 5:2023cv00939
Defendant:
Cimarron Correctional Facility, Darrell L Moore, Judge Phillip C Corley and others
Plaintiff:
Levi Luginbyhl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Dowling
as 4:2023cv00423
Petitioner:
Steve A White
Respondent:
Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Petty et al
as 4:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Malissa White
Defendant:
Michael Petty and Elizabeth Petty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mars v. White
as 5:2023cv00606
Petitioner:
Clarissa Marie Mars
Respondent:
Tamika White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weidenfelder v. White
as 4:2023cv00369
Petitioner:
Sonia R Weidenfelder
Defendant:
Tamika White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ressel et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00629
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ressel and Tanner Ressel
Defendant:
United States of America, Laura White, Angela Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
White v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Edward D White
Defendant:
City of Tulsa and Tulsa Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meadows v. City of Oklahoma City et al
as 5:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Cortez N. Meadows
Defendant:
City of Oklahoma City, Kassidy White, Nathan Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00528
Petitioner:
Rickey White
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Carl Bear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00527
Petitioner:
Rickey White
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and David Cule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
