Cases 11 - 19 of 19
BROOKS v. BLASKO et al
as 2:2010cv03844
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT BROOKS
Defendant:
BRANDY L. BLASKO, GARY A. OLINGER and MIKE WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VELASQUEZ v. DIGULILMO et al
as 2:2009cv00517
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN VELASQUEZ
Defendant:
DAVID DIGULILMO, JOHN K. MURRAY, A.S. WILLIAMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIERRA v. ENTITIES TO THE PENAL COLONIES OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2008cv02003
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO SIERRA
Defendant:
ENTITIES TO THE PENAL COLONIES OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, JOHN K. MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BROWN v. LEMASTERS CORRECTIONAL SERGEANT et al
as 2:2007cv01105
Plaintiff:
WALKEEN BROWN
Defendant:
LEMASTERS CORRECTIONAL SERGEANT, NELSON CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, KERR CORRECTIONAL OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2007cv02686
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MALIK MILLER
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, JOHN K. MURRAY, MICHAEL A. LORENZO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
OLINGER v. VAPOR, A BRUNSWICK COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv66007
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. OLINGER
Defendant:
VAPOR, A BRUNSWICK COMPANY, OWENS-CORNING, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MARTIN et al v. CANINO et al
as 2:2007cv01073
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MARTIN, CHARLES STARKS, ANTHONY DICKERSON and others
Defendant:
MARY CANINO, THOMAS DOHMAN, JOHN K. MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. KLOSS et al
as 2:2007cv00740
Plaintiff:
OLIVER HOLMES
Defendant:
SHELDON KLOSS, GARY OLINGER and DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2006cv04193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
