Cases 11 - 20 of 262
U.S. Bank Trust National Association v. White et al
as 6:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank Trust National Association
Defendant:
Diane White, Edna Lawson and Juanita Everett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Everett v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Robert Everett
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Reed v. The Lane Construction Corporation
as 1:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Everett Reed, III
Defendant:
The Lane Construction Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Everett v. City of San Diego Texas et al
as 2:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Lora Lee Everett
Defendant:
City of San Diego Texas and Bonnie Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sullens v. Wise County Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Everett Jesse Sullens
Defendant:
Wise County Sheriff Office, Chad Lanier, Charles Bryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everett v. G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv01225
Plaintiff:
Jill Everett
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions USA Inc. and Securitas Critical Infrastructure Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sullens v. Waybourn
as 4:2022cv01032
Petitioner:
Everett Jesse Sullens
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rayford v Taylor County DA
as 1:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Everett Rayford
Defendant:
Taylor County DA and Dan Joiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Probst v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
Everett Probst
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Everett v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2022cv02594
Plaintiff:
Zareth Everett
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
