Cases 11 - 20 of 3,413
Benard Austion v. Warden, USP Coleman I
as 5:2024cv00283
Petitioner:
Jasmine Benard Austion
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Smith v. Lopez et al
as 1:2024cv21845
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Federico I. Lopez and Miami-Dade Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BAILEY v. THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES BAILEY, III
Defendant:
THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, INSPECTOR GENERAL, ANGELA GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. ILOV305 I LLC et al
as 1:2024cv21761
Plaintiff:
Luis Flores
Defendant:
ILOV305 I LLC doing business as Wild N Out 305, Steven Davidovici and Erez Davidovici
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Greer v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
Andrew Greer
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
