Cases 11 - 20 of 485
Morales v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles
as 24-536
Petitioner:
HERIBERTO MORALES, as an individual and on behalf of others similarly situated
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Not Classified By Court:
ACTIV ENTERPRISES, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, formerly known as Doe 2, AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., formerly known as Doe 1 and others
Cahill, et al. v. NIKE, Inc.
as 24-165
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KELLY CAHILL, SARA JOHNSTON, LINDSAY ELIZABETH and others
Plaintiff:
TRACEE CHENG, SAMANTHA PHILLIPS, CINDY LEA LINEBAUGH and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NIKE, INC., an Oregon Corporation
Chen v. Hunan Manor Enterprise,
as 24-73
Defendant:
JINGCHAO LI, ZHIDA LI, HUNAN MANOR ENTERPRISE, INC., doing business as Hunan Manor and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHI MING CHEN, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, LIANHE ZHOU, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated,, WEI MIN ZHU, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff:
YONG KANG LIU, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, JIXIANG WANG, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, JIAN CAI, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
A TASTE OF MAO, INC., doing business as China Xiang and ZHENQI XIAO
Chen v. Hunan Manor Enterprise, Inc.
as 24-56
Defendant / Appellant:
JINGCHAO LI, ZHIDA LI, HUNAN MANOR ENTERPRISE, INC., doing business as Hunan Manor and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHI MING CHEN, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, LIANHE ZHOU, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, WEI MIN ZHU, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff:
YONG KANG LIU, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, JIXIANG WANG, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, JIAN CAI, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
WENSHENG ZHANG, ZHI BA LI, JIMMY CHEUNG and others
Morgan, et al. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation, et al.
as 23-4236
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATHANIEL MORGAN, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and MICHAEL BEVAN, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION, doing business as UTC Aerospace Systems doing business as Collins Aerospace, ROHR INC, UNITED TECHNOLOGY TRADE CORP. and others
Simon and Simon, PC, et al. v. Align Technology, Inc.
as 23-4153
Respondent:
SIMON AND SIMON, PC, doing business as City Smiles and VIP DENTAL SPAS, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Petitioner:
ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Sanchez Juarez et al v. 156-40 Grill LLC
as 23-7972
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARCO ANTONIO SANCHEZ JUAREZ and JANET GUTIERREZ, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated.
Not Yet Classified:
MICHAEL SIDERAKIS
Defendant:
156-40 GRILL LLC, GREEK GRILL CROSSBAY CORP, MARIA KARRAS-POLLATOS and others
Aidan Bevacqua v. Southwest Airlines Company
as 23-11036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Aidan Bevacqua, Amy Marcin, Kyle Walton, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Southwest Airlines Company, a Texas Corporation
Sullivan, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, v. A & T Financial Services et al
as 2:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Dianne Sullivan, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated,
Defendant:
A & T Financial Services and Clearpath Debt Relief
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jane Doe v. Torrance Memorial Medical Center
as 23-35336
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
