Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Kiel v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2018cv02391
Defendant:
DePuy Products Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, DOES 1-10, inclusive and others
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Alan Kiel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dudley v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2018cv00270
Petitioner:
Antonio Dudley
Respondent:
Stuart Jenkins , Sandra Mims , Jessica Kuhre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dudley v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2018cv00054
Respondent:
Joel Butler, Director Stuart Jenkins, Amy Kiel and others
Petitioner:
Antonio Dudley
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kiel-Mack v. Anthem, Inc.
as 4:2017cv03370
Defendant:
Anthem, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jonna Kiel-Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Dudley v. Thielke et al
as 1:2017cv00568
Defendant:
Joel Butler, Stuart Jenkins, Amy Kiel and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dudley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2017cv01448
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dudley
Defendant:
Stuart Jenkins, Jessica Kuhre, Amy Kiel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2016cv01317
Defendant:
Warden Damon Andrews, Joel Butler, Director Stuart Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dudley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2016cv03406
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dudley
Defendant:
Stuart Jenkins, Amy Kiel, Jessica Kuhre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2016cv00905
Defendant:
Joel Butler, Stuart Jenkins, Amy Kiel and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dudley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thunderhorse v. Owens et al
as 1:2016cv00541
Defendant:
Beth Benoit, Joel Butler, Christopher Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Iron Thunderhorse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
