Cases 11 - 20 of 3,585
GRODNICK v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv02616
Plaintiff:
DAVID GRODNICK
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., KENVUE INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MOSCATO et al v. LOPINTO et al
as 3:2024cv05720
Defendant:
ROBERT MOSCATO, LORI MOSCATO, SWOF VENTURES, LP. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
BOBACK v. GEISLER et al
as 2:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOBACK
Defendant:
MICHAEL S. GEISLER, ESQ., MICHAEL A. DORUNDO and CYNTHIA M. DORUNDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Estate of Arlene Sears et al v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Estate of Arlene Sears and Estate of Eliza R. Thorne
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A., Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Vida Capital Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Law Offices of Bruce J. Chasan, LLC, et al v. John Pierce, et al
as 24-1778
Plaintiff:
LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE J. CHASAN and BRUCE J. CHASAN
Defendant:
JOHN M. PIERCE, ESQ., JAMES D. BAINBRIDGE, ESQ., PIERCE BAINBRIDGE BECK PRICE & HECHT and others
LILY OF THE SKY, LLC v. JIMENEZ
as 2:2024cv05629
Plaintiff:
LILY OF THE SKY, LLC
Defendant:
JESSIKA JIMENEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Amy Gibriano v. Eisai Inc, et al
as 24-1745
Plaintiff:
AMY GIBRIANO, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
EISAI INC and ARENA PHARMACEUTICALS INC
KUHN v. WILLFORD
as 2:2024cv01123
Plaintiff:
PETER KUHN
Defendant:
JOVAN WILLFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Sam Antar v. BetMGM LLC, et al
as 24-1364
Plaintiff:
SAM A. ANTAR
Defendant:
BETMGM LLC, BORGATA HOTEL CASINO AND SPA and MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL INC
SPORTS UNIVERSITIES, LLC v. LYON
as 1:2024cv05354
Plaintiff:
SPORTS UNIVERSITIES, LLC
Defendant:
Roberta Marcenaro Lyon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
