Cases 11 - 20 of 1,229
Glaum v. Emerado, City of et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Glaum
Defendant:
Emerado, City of and Police Officer Daniel J. Lund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Allen
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Chris Baker
Defendant:
Christopher Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Macbolan v. Valley Rental et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Baker Chris Macbolan
Defendant:
Valley Rental and Eagle Crest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Demos v. Trump
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlson v. Burdick
as 1:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Sergei Isaac Scott Carlson
Respondent:
Birch P. Burdick and Joseph Joyce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akouala v. AGU Logistic et al
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Christian Akouala
Defendant:
AGU Logistic, Court of Works. Comp., Mac Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schuh v. Burgum et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh
Defendant:
Doug Burgum, Dave Krabbenhoft, Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Frank
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, Fargo Police Department, Police Officer Toby Carlsson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knorr v. Cass County Jail
as 3:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Gerald Knorr
Defendant:
Cass County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Etemad v. North Dakota Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00216
Petitioner:
Bejan David Etemad
Respondent:
North Dakota Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
