Cases 11 - 20 of 33,308
Baeza #341039 v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
Leonard Baeza
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shortey v. USA
as 2:2024cv00435
Petitioner:
Victor Adrian Shortey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Siler v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
Morgan Wayne Siler
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kepler et al v. NaphCare Incorporated et al
as 4:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Karina Kepler, Carlin Casey and Mary Hutchinson
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated, Pima, County of, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annear v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lynn Annear
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Clint Hickman and Dawn Noggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myer v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Maurissa Lynn Myer
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrera #152559 v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Jesse Herrera
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Unknown Figueroa and Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #299789 v. Kraft
as 2:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Addinika Ariel Smith
Defendant:
Brandon Kraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crago #115357 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell and Derric Keaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimenez v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Nicole Yvonne Jimenez
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
