Cases 191 - 200 of 288
Baker v. SRS, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00613
Plaintiff:
Nathan Baker
Defendant:
SRS Inc , Stanley Shones , Roberta Shones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Taylor v. Universal Auto Group I, Inc.
as 3:2013cv05245
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Taylor, Sr.
Defendant:
Universal Auto Group I, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Wallin v. Groom et al
as 2:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jesse D Wallin, Sr
Defendant:
Steve Groom, Gleen's Auto and Towing and Gregory L Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Harris et al v. Greyhound Lines Inc
as 2:2013cv00214
Plaintiff:
Marcell D. Harris, Sr. , Marcell D. Harris, Jr. and Renada L. Hill
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Debbs v. Seattle Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
Eural Dewayne Debbs, Sr
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department, Tawana Pfaff and Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Presley v. Torrence et al
as 3:2013cv05040
Plaintiff:
Orah Lee Presley, III
Defendant:
Gardner M Torrence, Sr and James F Troutt, II
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wallin v. State of Washington
as 2:2013cv00005
Petitioner:
Jesse D Wallin, Sr
Defendant:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. State of Texas et al
as 2:2012cv02100
Plaintiff:
Patrick Arnold White, Sr
Defendant:
State of Texas, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Prison Unit Wardens and Designees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv05961
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
White v. State of Texas
as 2:2012cv01782
Plaintiff:
Patrick Arnold White, Sr
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
