Cases 21 - 30 of 50,006
GOLEC v. EDUCATIONAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH GOLEC
Defendant:
EDUCATIONAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. doing business as HEARTLAND ECSI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jeffrey Goodwin v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 24-1852
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R. GOODWIN, n his capacity as trustee of the Dorothy M. Goodwin Trust
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, d/b/a Chase Bank
Lovoi v. Barra et al
as 1:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Gerald Joseph Lovoi
Defendant:
Mary T. Barra, Aneel Bhusri, Wesley G. Bush and others
LM INSURANCE CORPORATION v. FAVOR SERVICES INC. et al
as 1:2024cv05932
Plaintiff:
LM INSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant:
FAVOR SERVICES INC. and NOVIE PRAMUDITA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
LANDOLFI v. JONES et al
as 3:2024cv05908
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LANDOLFI
Defendant:
RENE JONES and M&T BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. ARIHANT OF SC LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05919
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
ARIHANT OF SC LLC, BHAVIK SHAH and MITAL SHAH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Little et al v. Farmers Insurance Group d/b/a Economy Preferred Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv01950
Plaintiff:
Sharon Little and Scott Little
Defendant:
FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP doing business as ECONOMY PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
FleetPride, Inc. v. Hollinger
as 1:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
FleetPride, Inc.
Defendant:
Christopher Hollinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
720 LEXINGTON AVE LLC D/B/A 722 LEXINGTON AVENUE v. WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv05896
Plaintiff:
720 LEXINGTON AVE LLC D/B/A 722 LEXINGTON AVENUE
Defendant:
WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
