Cases 21 - 30 of 50,117
ALKHATIB v. RICHARDS et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
LATIF ALKHATIB
Defendant:
M. RICHARDS, E. BROWN, R. WESTOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carty v. Pennsylvania Parole Board et al
as 1:2024cv00733
Petitioner:
Donald Charles Carty
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Parole Board and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. USA
as 3:2024cv00727
Petitioner:
Anthony Quamaine Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bozier v. Warden of SCI-Dallas et al
as 3:2024cv00728
Petitioner:
Michael Bozier
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Dallas and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Posey v. Brittain et al
as 3:2024cv00730
Petitioner:
Ajani Posey
Respondent:
Kathy Brittain and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tejada v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Ricky Tejada
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUCAS v. BRITTAIN et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
KEYON LUCAS
Respondent:
KATHY J. BRITTAIN, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: JAMES NORMAN ZIEGENFUSS, JR.
as 2:2024cv01846
Plaintiff:
JAMES NORMAN ZIEGENFUSS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. LACOLMB et al
as 2:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
PIERRE LACOLMB, C/O GINDRAW, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOSKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01845
Plaintiff:
TITO HOSKINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
