Cases 21 - 30 of 314
Scott v. Lebanon Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jerry Scott
Defendant:
Lebanon Correctional Institution, Inmate Jefferson and Warden Mr. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bly et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Arthur Bly and Maribel Arras Bly
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thyme v. Swartz et al
as 5:2022cv02197
Plaintiff:
Arthur Thyme
Defendant:
Jane A. Swartz, Jeremy Swartz, Catholic Diocese of Toledo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brozowsky, Jr. v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04114
Plaintiff:
Arthur Brozowsky, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Vega v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03491
Plaintiff:
Arthur Vega
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arthur v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01674
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Nichole Arthur
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Wulfhop v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01657
Plaintiff:
Arthur A. Wulfhop
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DiBartolomeo et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01333
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR J. DIBARTOLOMEO and LAURIE M. DIBARTOLOMEO
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eury v. Brooks et al
as 1:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Eury
Defendant:
Robert Brooks, Albert Thrower and Arthur Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
