Cases 21 - 30 of 300
CHAPMAN v. SKYLAR et al
as 4:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN
Defendant:
SKYLAR and OCTAPHARMA PLASMA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
REID v. LAND et al
as 3:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
RHONDA REID
Defendant:
JUDGE CLAY D LAND, GREENE COUNTY, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REID v. EVANS et al
as 3:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
RHONDA REID
Defendant:
TYNASHA EVANS, SHARON STEMBRIDGE, TAMEKA CHAPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Chapman v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2022cv01659
Plaintiff:
Teresa Chapman
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
CHAPMAN v. SOUTHERN INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS INC et al
as 5:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
CHANDA CHAPMAN
Defendant:
SOUTHERN INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS INC and GREAT LAKES SOUTHERN INSURANCE SE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
ROBINSON v. CHAPMAN
as 3:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEWIS ROBINSON
Defendant:
SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. CHAPMAN
as 3:2022cv00022
Petitioner:
PAUL LEWIS ROBINSON
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRIS v. CHAPMAN
as 3:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
DAVID C HARRIS
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clervrain v. Shafer et al
as 1:2022cv00001
Defendant:
Peter B. Rutledge, David Shafer, Yang Yuanqing and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
NXT Healthcare, Inc. v. OCI Limited et al
as 1:2021cv04754
Plaintiff:
NXT Healthcare, Inc.
Defendant:
OCI Limited and Oliver Philip Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
