Cases 21 - 30 of 205
Fisher v. Javois
as 2:2023cv04064
Petitioner:
George W Fisher
Respondent:
Laurent Javois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McConville v. Fisher et al
as 4:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jason McConville
Defendant:
Jason D. Fisher and Medallion Transport & Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fisher v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Fisher
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fisher v. Javois
as 4:2022cv00799
Petitioner:
George W Fisher
Respondent:
Laurent Javois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fisher v. Stange
as 1:2022cv00139
Petitioner:
Brandon Eugene Fisher
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fisher v. Precythe et al
as 2:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
William Rydell Fisher
Defendant:
Ann L. Precythe, Redington, P. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Javois
as 4:2022cv00531
Petitioner:
George W Fisher
Respondent:
Laurent Javois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Humphries et al v. Experitec, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Kathy Humphries, Jeff Humphries, Tina Humphries Meadows and others
Defendant:
Experitec, Inc., Fisher Controls International, LLC and J.P. Bushnell Packing Supply Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Fisher v. Javois
as 4:2022cv00322
Petitioner:
George W Fisher
Respondent:
Laurent Javois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fisher v. Javois
as 4:2022cv00310
Petitioner:
George W Fisher
Respondent:
Laurent Javois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
