Cases 21 - 30 of 227
Eaves v. Jennings
as 3:2022cv00374
Plaintiff:
Michael Eaves
Defendant:
Judge Rebecca Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holbrook et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Darrell Holbrook, Tammy Holbrook, Eddie Bentley and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Mine Safety Appliances Company, LLC, American Optical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Rose v. Greenville KY OPCO LLC
as 4:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Rose
Defendant:
Greenville KY OPCO LLC doing business as Maple Health and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2011 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McIntosh et al v. City of Madisonville, Kentucky
as 4:2021cv00126
Plaintiff:
Michael McIntosh and Rebecca McIntosh
Defendant:
City of Madisonville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
King v. Hanging Rock LTC, LLC
as 3:2021cv00697
Plaintiff:
Rebecca King
Defendant:
Hanging Rock LTC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elliott et al v. Collins et al
as 1:2021cv00152
Defendant:
Rebecca Clodfelter, Wesley Collins, Max Clodfelter and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Elliott and Elaine Digges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Hindman v. Hicks et al
as 4:2021cv00122
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Jean Hindman
Defendant:
James Hicks and Jared Winters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
