Cases 21 - 30 of 126
Cole v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00178
Plaintiff:
Russel E. Cole
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Wayland Kirkland v. William Barr, et al
as 20-5377
Respondent / Appellee:
William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States of America, Craig E. Cole, past fired court appointed lawyer for Petitioner, fired retained attorney of record for Petitioner's nephew, Coby Joe Pearson, Respondent in paternity case no. 2020-DM-05, Steven A. Jensen, Attorney for Chasity Nicole Gochenour in paternity case no. 2020-DM-05 and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Wayland Dee Kirkland
Cole, Jr. et al v. McVey
as 6:2020cv01356
Defendant:
Joshua H. McVey
Plaintiff:
Denise K. Cole and Aaron E. Cole, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02945
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Cole v. Esely et al
as 3:2020cv00935
Plaintiff:
John E. Cole
Defendant:
Z. Wilson, J. Mallard and Matthew Esely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLE v. DAVIS
as 5:2020cv00136
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E COLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLE v. DAVIS
as 5:2020cv00115
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E COLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haberli v. Iron Works Construction LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00473
Defendant:
Iron Works Construction Company of Baileys Harbor Inc., Iron Works Construction LLC and Michael E. Cole
Plaintiff:
Anthony Haberli
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
COLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv36068
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE E COLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. Singleton et al
as 6:2020cv00133
Defendant:
Sheriff Mena, Town of Eatonville, Comey Singleton and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory R. Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
