Cases 21 - 30 of 1,072
Garcia v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00209
Petitioner:
Segundo Tarquino Guero Garcia and Segundo Tarquino Cuero Garcia
Respondent:
H. L. Ray and Heather L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Staples, Bey v. Childress et al
as 2:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Don Juan Staples, Bey
Defendant:
H. Childress, Matt Hill, Officer Daber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Damron v. Rays et al
as 3:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Thomas Damron
Defendant:
H. Rays, A. Messenger, Oslin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ozsusamlar v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00120
Petitioner:
Mustafa Ozsusamlar
Respondent:
H. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fluid v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00164
Petitioner:
Salatheo H. Fluid
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Espinal v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Carlos Espinal
Respondent:
Warden H. L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hale v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00026
Petitioner:
Vance Lamont Hale
Respondent:
H. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Friedman v. Massile et al
as 2:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Jerome H. Friedman, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Jacob Massile, Mr. Francis, Attorney Larry Harrah, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gondres-Medrano v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00059
Petitioner:
Maximo H. Gondres-Medrano
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden Lefever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kessler v. Lewis et al
as 5:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Kessler, III
Defendant:
Cornelius Russell Lewis, Gold Quality Foods, Cpl. N. J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
