Cases 21 - 30 of 155
Lopez
as 6:2022cv01614
Plaintiff:
Tina Louise Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Mena et al v. Portland Drywall Systems Enterprise, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01317
Plaintiff:
Sergio Mena, Adriana Ramirez, Francisco Solorzano and others
Defendant:
Portland Drywall Systems Enterprise, Inc., THE SPANOS CORPORATION, SOUTH COOPER MOUNTAIN APARTMENTS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01287
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
USA v. $13,895 (US)
as 1:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$13,895 (US) and Sergio Lopez-Zalvaza
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01153
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lopez v. Freud America, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00902
Plaintiff:
Alexander Lopez
Defendant:
Freud America, Inc. and William F Bray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00878
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lopez v. Balaska et al
as 3:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
Martin Lopez
Defendant:
Sgt. Balaska, Deputy Weitzez, Deputy Zack Orava and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Interian-Pacho et al
as 3:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Officer D. Interian-Pacho, Officer Felipe Lopez, Portland Police Bureau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
