Cases 21 - 30 of 49
ORTIZ v. USA
as 1:2016cv00674
Petitioner:
ESTELLA GONZALEZ ORTIZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RIOS v. USA
as 1:2016cv00658
Petitioner:
MAYRA RAMONA ORTIZ RIOS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Martinez, et al v. Apex Coach LLC, et al
as 5:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Wilfredo Martinez and Wilfredo Ortiz
Defendant:
Apex Coach LLC and Eric Tyrek Jimmerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cunningham v. Ortiz et al
as 5:2015cv00465
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Justin Ortiz, Medical Life Alarm, LLC, PNHC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Hill v. The Wake County Administration et al
as 5:2015cv00223
Plaintiff:
Dwight L. Hill, Sr.
Defendant:
The Wake County Administration, Raleigh City Administration to Wake County, Jesus M. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ortiz-Gomez v. USA
as 5:2014cv00802
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Israel Gomez-Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ortiz v. Hassell et al
as 5:2013cv00693
Plaintiff:
Kelly Jenkins Ortiz
Defendant:
Sam T Hassell , Marketel Media, Inc. , Intelimarc Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Marketel Media, Inc. et al v. Mediapotamus, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00427
Plaintiff:
Marketel Media, Inc. and Samuel T Hassell
Defendant:
Mediapotamus, Inc. and Kelly J Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SANCHEZ et al v. TRUSE TRUCKING, INC.
as 1:2013cv00415
Plaintiff:
ERICK GARCIA SANCHEZ , JOSUE CHAN CHAG , MIGUEL A. ROJAS TUMALAN and others
Defendant:
TRUSE TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Meineke Car Care Centers, Inc. et al v. Abomb Results, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00760
Plaintiff:
Meineke Car Care Centers, Inc. and EconoLube N' Tune, Inc.
Defendant:
Abomb Results, LLC, Melissa Ortiz and Adam Reich
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
