Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Penrod v. Quick et al
as 1:2011cv03273
Plaintiff:
Donald Adam Penrod
Defendant:
Don Quick, Susan Jones and Tom Clements
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Geithner et al
as 1:2011cv01366
Plaintiff:
Wayne Andrews
Defendant:
Timothy Geithner, Douglas Shulman, Officer in Charge of Collections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gates v. Griffith et al
as 1:2010cv02417
Plaintiff:
Dean Gates
Defendant:
Marshall Griffith, Cheryl Smith, Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lutalo v. Mobley et al
as 1:2010cv02185
Plaintiff:
Ojore N. Lutalo
Defendant:
Shawn Mobley, Eric Ledford, Todd Quick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Quick et al
as 1:2009cv02394
Plaintiff:
Wayne Andrews
Defendant:
Gary Quick, Director, Roseanne M. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Moreno v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2009cv01492
Plaintiff:
Zachary Paul Moreno
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Adams County, Commerce City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olds v. Esslinger et al
as 1:2009cv01472
Plaintiff:
Brian Olds
Defendant:
Ray Esslinger, Terry Haase, City of Westminster, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mahan v. Huber et al
as 1:2009cv00098
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Mahan
Defendant:
Roxy Huber, Colorado Department of Motor Vehicles, Colorado State Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Quick v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2008cv01845
Plaintiff:
Barbara Allen Quick
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Brummond v. Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility
as 1:2007cv00624
Plaintiff:
Matthew Scott Brummond
Defendant:
Bill Ritter, John Suthers, Harlan Bockman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
