Cases 21 - 30 of 115
ROTH et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2019cv02179
Plaintiff:
Amy Payne, Robert S. Bruce, CASSANDRA ISABELLA and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
CLARK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv01891
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
RALPH CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTOS et al v. BEAU THAI MT PLEASANT, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00433
Defendant:
BEAU THAI MT PLEASANT, LLC, RALPH GOLDEN BRABHAM, ANDREW RAY PORTERFIELD and others
Plaintiff:
ORFILIA GARCIA PAZ and FRANCISCO SANTOS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
SCHWARTZ et al v. IRAN
as 1:2018cv01349
Plaintiff:
RUTH SCHWARTZ , ARI SCHWARTZ , RUTH SCHWARTZ AND ARI SCHWARTZ FOR THE ESTATE OF EZRA SCHWARTZ and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
GAUDINO v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00930
Plaintiff:
RALPH GAUDINO
Defendant:
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC. and MARK BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NYBAKKEN v. TAYLOR COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00914
Plaintiff:
INGAR NYBAKKEN
Defendant:
TAYLOR COMPANIES, INC. and RALPH C. TAYLOR, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUTHER v. NORTHAM
as 1:2018cv00853
Plaintiff:
L. RUTHER
Defendant:
RALPH NORTHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMILTON v. LOWE et al
as 1:2017cv01977
Plaintiff:
JAN B. HAMILTON
Defendant:
JENNIFER LOWE, OFFICERS AND TRUSTEES OF THE SUPREME COURT HISTORICAL SOCIETY, RALPH I. LANCASTER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OAK RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL PEACE ALLIANCE et al v. PERRY et al
as 1:2017cv01446
Plaintiff:
OAK RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL PEACE ALLIANCE , NUCLEAR WATCH OF NEW MEXICO , NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Defendant:
JAMES RICHARD PERRY and FRANK G. KLOTZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
