Cases 21 - 30 of 947
Samassa v. Golden et al
as 2:2024cv02201
Plaintiff:
Djibril H. Samassa
Defendant:
Officer Golden, Officer Taylor, Officer Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Oakes et al
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Daren M Taylor
Defendant:
Stacy Oakes, Michael Parris and Brandon Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Cooper et al
as 3:2024mc00018
Petitioner:
James K Taylor
Respondent:
Bryan K Antonelli, Chief Cooper and Roger D. Wilson Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keach v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Keach
Defendant:
Ashly Taylor Martin, Stephen Taylor and Mary Beth Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Landis v. Greyson et al
as 3:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Barry Landis
Defendant:
Ash Greyson, Jason Brown, Robert Taylor and others
Taylor v. Tennessee Board of Parole et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
Tennessee Board of Parole and Dora Werner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taebel v. Swift
as 3:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Taylor Swift
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Jones v. Buttermilk Ranch, LLC
as 3:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Taylor Jones
Defendant:
Buttermilk Ranch, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Simmons et al v. Southeastern Crane Services, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Travis Simmons, Dennis Taylor and Southern Operators Health Fund
Defendant:
Southeastern Crane Services, LLC and Kenneth Mullens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Taylor v. Wardlow et al
as 1:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Curtis Taylor
Defendant:
Jerry Wardlow, Purtle, Olsburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
