Cases 21 - 30 of 169
Nelson v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00237
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Nelson
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00236
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Charles W. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00058
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Charles W. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00059
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Nelson
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alston v. Governor Ron Desantis et al
as 3:2020cv01438
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Harry L. Shorstein, Angela Corey-Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Pressley B. Alston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Desantis et al
as 3:2020cv01362
Defendant:
Adrian Soud, Jr., Chyna M. Makarowski, Mike Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Jahmal C. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Soud et al
as 3:2020cv01312
Defendant:
D. W. Digiorgi, Adrian Soud, Chyna Makarowski and others
Plaintiff:
Jahmal C Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv01091
Defendant:
Mark Mahon, Ronnie Fussell, Attorney General William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua L Gordon and Jahmal C. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Struck et al
as 2:2020cv01149
Defendant:
Nathan T Gaudet, Joshua R Struck, Brad W Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick Nelson, et al v. Nicholas Weber, et al
as 20-35562
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLETTE RAPP and PATRICK W.. NELSON
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS WEBER, Department of Corrections Officer and MICHAEL POSTON, Department of Corrections Officer, in their Individual Capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
