Cases 21 - 30 of 30
CARINO v. FONTOURA
as 2:2016mc00272
Plaintiff:
ROSALINDA O. CARINO
Defendant:
ARMANDO B. FONTOURA
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
MCNEIL v. ARLP TRUST et al
as 2:2016cv04394
Plaintiff:
DARRIN EDWARD MCNEIL
Defendant:
ARLP TRUST, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC, STERN AND EISENBERG P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARINO v. FONTOURA
as 2:2015cv06213
Plaintiff:
ROSALINDA O. CARINO
Defendant:
ARMANDO B. FONTOURA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARINO v. FONTOURA
as 2:2015cv06143
Plaintiff:
ROSALINDA O. CARINO
Defendant:
ARMANDO B. FONTOURA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WAGNER v. BRITTEN et al
as 2:2015cv02272
Plaintiff:
JACONDA WAGNER
Defendant:
THOMAS BRITTEN, JR., THOMAS BRITTEN, SR., JACQUELINE ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
County of Niagara v. Voutour et al
as 1:2010cv01004
Plaintiff:
County of Niagara and James R. Voutour
Defendant:
County of Essex, Essex County Sheriff's Office and Armando B. Fontoura
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
GONZALEZ et al v. DOW et al
as 2:2010cv06059
Plaintiff:
ISABEL GONZALEZ , AG , JG and others
Defendant:
PAULA T. DOW, ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, ARMANDO B. FONTOURA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OHAN v. ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 2:2009cv01977
Plaintiff:
FESTUS O. OHAN
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, ESSEX COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, ARMANDO B. FONTOURA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOCAL 54 PATROLMAN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION et al v. FONTOURA et al
as 2:2008cv03909
Plaintiff:
LOCAL 54 PATROLMAN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, DANIEL AMORESANO, CLARENCE ATES and others
Defendant:
ARMANDO B. FONTOURA, JOSEPH DIVINCENZO, JR., JOHN DOES 1 to 10 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
OLIVER vs D'AMICO, et al
as 2:2007cv01968
Plaintiff:
LORENZO OLIVER
Defendant:
JOHN D'AMICO, ARMANDO B. FONTOURA and SONYA NOYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
