Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Walker v. Oakley et al
as 2:2012cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jamie Walker
Defendant:
M. A. Oakley and Mrs. Carver
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Carver Internation, Inc. v. Kappos et al
as 1:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Carver Internation, Inc.
Defendant:
David J. Kappos and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Carver v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv00066
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Rose M. Carver
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dowdy v. Albemarle Charlottesville Regional Jail
as 7:2011cv00457
Defendant:
Albemarle Charlottesville Regional Jail, Lt. Carver, Cpl. Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Ryland Dowdy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carver v. Bayer CropScience, Inc., et al
as 4:2011cv03306
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience, Inc.,, 3M Business Product Sales, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lester Arnold Carver, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Pollard & Bagby Realtors et al
as 3:2009cv00241
Plaintiff:
Angela R. Jones
Defendant:
Pollard & Bagby Realtors, William Goodman, Shirley Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fraud
Broughman v. Carver
as 7:2008cv00548
Plaintiff:
Allan Broughman
Defendant:
Larry S. Carver
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Mandanapu v. Matthews et al
as 7:2007cv00219
Plaintiff:
Praveen Kumar Mandanapu
Defendant:
R. Matthews, Carver and Minor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freed v. Carver
as 1:2007cv00252
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Freed
Defendant:
Richard E. Carver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Libel, Assault, Slander
Mandanapu v. Matthews et al
as 3:2007cv00097
Plaintiff:
Praveen Kumar Mandanapu
Defendant:
R. Matthews, Carver and Minor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
